Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections
Shortcuts: COM:AN/B • COM:AN/P • COM:RFPP
|
This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vandalism [] |
User problems [] |
Blocks and protections [] |
Other [] |
|
Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.
|
Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.
|
Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.
|
Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS. |
| Archives | |||
126, 125, 124, 123, 122, 121, 120, 119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 |
102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
| ||
Note
- For page protection requests, please state protection type, file name, and proposed protection time span. See also: Protection Policy.
- Before proposing a user be blocked, please familiarize yourself with the Commons' Blocking Policy.
- Remember to sign and date all comments using four tildes (
~~~~), which translates into a signature and a time stamp. - Notify the user(s) concerned via their user talk page(s).
{{subst:Discussion-notice|noticeboard=COM:AN/B|thread=|reason=}}is available for this. - Administrators: Please make a note if a report is dealt with, to avoid unnecessary responses by other admins.
Creation protection of large intentional redcats
[edit]- Apply creation protection to the following titles: Category:W3c-nc-ET, Category:W3c-nc-Sq, Category:W3c-nc-Sr, Category:W3c-nc-A3, Category:W3c-nc-Tv, Category:W3c-nc-JN, Category:W3c-nc-BF, Category:W3c-nc-Ad, Category:W3c-nc-TC, Category:W3c-nc-Sp, Category:W3c-nc-Sy
- Reason: These categories are used to house unchecked SVG files of various types, and they are (according to this log and this discussion) deliberately kept uncreated for visibility. @Kontributor 2K: is better involved in this may have further information.
- Purpose: This is not to counter vandalism, but rather to prevent accidental good-faith creation of the titles. I am personally currently working on reducing the Special:WantedCategories backlog in which they often show up, and presumably other users may encounter the larger ones. So creation protection would communicate the categories' intentions well.
Rose Abrams (talk) 10:27, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Rose Abrams: could you explain what these are about and why the categories should not be created? I suspect the reason no admin has picked this up is that, like me, they are not sure what is going on here and don't want to be responsible for something they don't understand. - Jmabel ! talk 20:17, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Kontributor 2K could you answer Jmabel about this? You seem to be familiar with these specific categories and the associated efforts, while I am a cross-Commons categorizer who just encounters them by chance. Rose Abrams (talk) 20:30, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
- Actually the red letters W3c-nc-User-ID at the bottom of the image pages are just reminders I use not to forget that the files have not been w3c-checked, and incidentally to group process the files if needed. Since in the end these categories will be emptied, there's no reason for them to be created ; this said, these categories are in my watch list and an accidental creation would be unlikely, since there is now a message on top, if not unproblematic. So eventually I don't care if they're protected or not. --Kontributor 2K (talk) 11:04, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Kontributor 2K: if you intend to keep deliberately placing files in these categories (even if only temporarily in each case), could you please create them as user categories? That would hide them from people who are not logged in, and keep them out of the lists of categories needing creation. Thanks. - Jmabel ! talk 20:01, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: I could, but actually I don't intend to keep deliberately placing files in there, only remove them (once w3c-checked) - also, some faster solution might be, for people involved in Special:WantedCategories, to participate to a special 2-days-w3c-mass-file-validation marathon. just an idea. --Kontributor 2K (talk) 20:09, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
- edit : ok, I've created categories for the ones where there are the most files, I shall empty the others by next week --Kontributor 2K (talk) 20:42, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Kontributor 2K: if you intend to keep deliberately placing files in these categories (even if only temporarily in each case), could you please create them as user categories? That would hide them from people who are not logged in, and keep them out of the lists of categories needing creation. Thanks. - Jmabel ! talk 20:01, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
- Actually the red letters W3c-nc-User-ID at the bottom of the image pages are just reminders I use not to forget that the files have not been w3c-checked, and incidentally to group process the files if needed. Since in the end these categories will be emptied, there's no reason for them to be created ; this said, these categories are in my watch list and an accidental creation would be unlikely, since there is now a message on top, if not unproblematic. So eventually I don't care if they're protected or not. --Kontributor 2K (talk) 11:04, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
- @Kontributor 2K could you answer Jmabel about this? You seem to be familiar with these specific categories and the associated efforts, while I am a cross-Commons categorizer who just encounters them by chance. Rose Abrams (talk) 20:30, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Please block my account indefinitely. LGBT users aren't welcome here. I don't want to be dumb enough to try coming back again and again. Thanks. Geoffroi 20:47, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
- You can add {{Retired}} to your user page. Users should not be blocked unless it falls within the blocking policy. Thuresson (talk) 19:58, 21 December 2025 (UTC)
_(cropped)_(higher_res).jpg){kind=link}
Caption vandalism due to the subject matter is a pain to revert all the time. Protection would be great. JayCubby (talk) 17:32, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
_(cropped)_(higher_res).jpg){kind=link}
Done: Semiprotected for 3 months. --Achim55 (talk) 17:40, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
- Danke! JayCubby (talk) 18:04, 22 December 2025 (UTC)
User impersonation
[edit]Deantak (talk · contribs) has impersonated Dean Takahashi to upload his photograph; I've spoken to Dean, who confirmed the user is not him (though he has graciously granted permission for the photo anyway). I can't see anything in the username policy that addresses this directly, but I figured it was worth reporting the impersonation. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 22:09, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
- Against policy for being "confusing" and "disruptive". DMacks (talk) 22:33, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
- Done indef-blocked. If they want to participate here, they need a different account name. No other edits on this one, so no point to renaming it. - Jmabel ! talk 01:41, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
This i MY photo and I'd like to upload better quality version of it. Chepry (talk) 03:08, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
- It seems it is protected by cascading protection from Commons:Auto-protected files/wikipedia/pl, apparently bot-maintained and related to something in the Polish Wikipedia. It was added to that list only 4 hours before you made this request, which is about a file you haven't touched since 2012. Would you mind explaining why you suddenly now want to edit it? This all seems a bit odd.
- Also Pinging @AntiCompositeNumber, Legoktm, Steinsplitter, Krinkle: what would be the preferred way to remove this from its cascading protection? - Jmabel ! talk 06:44, 24 December 2025 (UTC)